God’s Big Gamble

This is the second post in a series on heaven, hell and God’s love.
We spend a great deal of time trying to measure up. 
Teachers begin grading our work when we’re children.  At some point we all became aware of something called a “permanent record.”
Coaches decide how much playing time we get, admissions officers determine our college acceptance, and employers hire, promote, and fire us.  We strain to prove that we deserve to be on that field, on that campus, and in that office.
Standards have their place.  They hold us accountable and can help us to improve our performance.  There is nothing wrong with dispensing rewards for measuring up to a standard.
Love—genuine love—is not a reward for measuring up.  It is a free gift freely given.
This is why so many people wonder why a loving God could condemn anyone to hell.  They understand heaven and hell as reward and punishment.  God measures us according to a moral standard and then dispenses judgment.  Those who measure up go to heaven.  God sends the misfits and slackers to hell.

This model of heaven and hell involves God solely as a just judge.  It also suggests that we spend our lives scrambling to build an adequate moral resume.  Life and afterlife, on this model, are all about measuring up.

It’s just one small step to saying that God love us for our moral achievement.
If you know anything about the Gospel of Jesus Christ, you know that this is emphatically not the case.  God loves us because of who he is, not as a result of our moral performance.
And yet, heaven and hell are clearly a part of God’s plan for us.  Jesus himself talks about heaven and hell quite a bit.
This makes no sense. 
And it never will so long as we think that life and our relationship with our God is basically about measuring up.  We need to set aside the notion that life is principally about accumulating enough moral credits to win admission to heaven and to avoid condemnation to hell.
We got to this intellectual dead end because we started in the wrong place.  Let’s try a different starting place.
God is love.  He created us in his image.  In other words, he created us to know the joy of being loved by him, of loving him in response to that love, and of loving each other from the depths of his love for us.  God made us for relationship with him and with each other.
From the very start, God chose to involve himself in a big gamble.
Love is freely given.  It cannot be coerced.  The ability to love carries with it the capacity to withhold that love. 
When God created us to be loving beings, he knew that we would be able to refuse to give and receive the very love that makes our lives worth living.
If we are to be truly free, hell must be at least a logical possibility for us.  That’s because we can choose to reject God’s love for us and withhold our love from others.  This is at the root of eternal damnation, just as accepting the love freely offered forms the foundation of heaven.
This life contains foretastes of heaven and hell alike.  For the most part, the initial foretastes of hell amount to a kind of eternal false advertising.
Have you ever said, “It seemed like a good idea at the time?” Then maybe you know the sort of thing I’m talking about.  That’s what we’ll explore next time: how our spiritual habits have an eternal trajectory.
In future posts we’ll look at a life based on mercy instead of moral achievement, how love and judgment are two sides of the same coin, and how heaven begins to insinuate itself into our lives every day.


  1. This explains why some people think that Christians use good morals to achieve eternal life. When Christians practice morals it should be the result from understanding God's love for themselves as well as everyone else. That the love of God gave all people the chance of obtaining eternal life. So, it is not about doing good to obtain eternal life, because if it was that way, then no one could obtain it since no one is perfect on earth and that is why God gave His son's life for us. Since Jesus lived life as we do on earth, but Jesus is perfect and showed us that. He went and brought all sin upon himself to show mankind how much God loves us. By doing so, and being resurrected after 3 days, it gave us- by God's grace, the free choice of going heaven or hell.


  2. Timothy Keller's phrase aptly describes the mistake that you outline: the moral performance narrative. As you point out so well, the Gospel is not a story about our moral achievements. It is the story of Christ has done for us on the Cross.


  3. It is good to see the “true”-“good news” of the New Covenant is being told without the sense of the old covenant, because the two should not be mixed, since the New covenant by God's grace gives us true freedom in His love, while the old covenant is a veil of laws which became a barrier between the people and God. Also, is was a fearful relationship with God, unlike the New covenant which introduces God as our “heavenly father” and this I believe is a turning point when believers see God as their father in their lives. The New covenant that God introduced with His son Jesus broke the barrier of the old covenant, so that all people could have the ability to choose to believe or not. I know there is a problem with mixing the two covenants. Anyways, praise God, and thank you for your studies in the truth of God.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.